Fly.io
Security FAQ

What are common security mistakes in Fly.io apps?

Get instant answers about your app's security.

Short Answer

The mistakes we see repeatedly in Fly.io apps: secrets synchronization across regions; edge deployment security; private networking configuration. Each one is a specific failure mode of Fly.io's workflow — not generic programming mistakes.

Detailed Answer

The mistakes we actually see in Fly.io apps

These aren't hypothetical — they're what VAS finds when it scans a Fly.io app for the first time. Listed in order of how often they appear:

1. Secrets synchronization across regions

*Why it happens:* A common failure mode in Fly.io applications: secrets synchronization across regions. Left unchecked, this can lead to data exposure, unauthorized access, or service abuse.

*Fix:* Move all secrets server-side (environment variables, serverless functions). Rotate any keys previously in frontend code. Audit bundles for leftover credentials before each deploy.

2. Edge deployment security

*Why it happens:* A common failure mode in Fly.io applications: edge deployment security. Left unchecked, this can lead to data exposure, unauthorized access, or service abuse.

*Fix:* Scan your deployed application with a security tool that understands this stack. Address the specific findings — generic best practices don't catch platform-specific misconfigurations.

3. Private networking configuration

*Why it happens:* A common failure mode in Fly.io applications: private networking configuration. Left unchecked, this can lead to data exposure, unauthorized access, or service abuse.

*Fix:* Scan your deployed application with a security tool that understands this stack. Address the specific findings — generic best practices don't catch platform-specific misconfigurations.

4. Volume and persistence security

*Why it happens:* A common failure mode in Fly.io applications: volume and persistence security. Left unchecked, this can lead to data exposure, unauthorized access, or service abuse.

*Fix:* Scan your deployed application with a security tool that understands this stack. Address the specific findings — generic best practices don't catch platform-specific misconfigurations.

Why these specifically show up in Fly.io (and not as much elsewhere)

Fly.io's workflow optimizes for speed — idea to deployed app in minutes. The mistakes above aren't character flaws, they're the predictable output of a speed-optimized workflow that doesn't enforce security gates. "Secrets synchronization across regions" is high-likelihood in Fly.io specifically because nothing in Fly.io's UI flows blocks it. The fix is treating security gates as non-negotiable, not as "I'll get to it later."

Security Research & Statistics

10.3%

of Lovable applications (170 out of 1,645) had exposed user data in the CVE-2025-48757 incident

Source: CVE-2025-48757 security advisory

4.45 million USD

average cost of a data breach in 2023

Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023

500,000+

developers using vibe coding platforms like Lovable, Bolt, and Replit

Source: Combined platform statistics 2024-2025

Expert Perspectives

There's a new kind of coding I call 'vibe coding', where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists.

Andrej KarpathyFormer Tesla AI Director, OpenAI Co-founder

Vibe coding your way to a production codebase is clearly risky. Most of the work we do as software engineers involves evolving existing systems, where the quality and understandability of the underlying code is crucial.

Simon WillisonSecurity Researcher, Django Co-creator

Check Your Fly.io App's Security

VAS scans for all the security issues mentioned above. Get a comprehensive security report in minutes.

Get Starter Scan

More Questions About This Topic

How common are these mistakes in Fly.io apps — is this overstated?

Understated, if anything. The majority of Fly.io apps scanned for the first time have at least one of the high-likelihood mistakes above. "Secrets synchronization across regions" in particular is the default state of a new Fly.io app before any security work. Our sample skews toward apps whose owners care enough to scan — the base rate for never-scanned Fly.io apps is higher.

What are the actual consequences when these mistakes ship to production?

The consequence ladder: (a) data exposure — emails, passwords, PII, payment info readable by anyone; (b) account takeover — if auth is weak, legitimate accounts get hijacked; (c) third-party abuse — an exposed OpenAI or Stripe key gets drained of quota or money; (d) regulatory — GDPR/CCPA notification requirements trigger at ~first exposure; (e) reputational — "Fly.io app data breach" is a headline that doesn't age well. Each consequence compounds the next.

How do I avoid these mistakes when building with Fly.io?

Three non-negotiable habits: (1) Configure Row Level Security (RLS) policies at table/collection creation — before writing any feature code. (2) Treat any paste-a-key-into-code as a bug from the first keystroke, not "I'll move it to env vars later." (3) Run a VAS scan before every production deploy — five minutes of scanning prevents hours-to-weeks of breach response. Specifically: Move all secrets server-side (environment variables, serverless functions). Rotate any keys previously in frontend code. Audit bundles for leftover credentials before each deploy..