Cursor
Security FAQ

How secure is Cursor?

Get instant answers about your app's security.

Short Answer

Cursor gives you the primitives for a secure app (Supabase, managed auth, hosting), but every real-world Cursor breach we track comes from missed configuration — not missing platform features. Secure-by-default it is not.

Detailed Answer

What Cursor gives you out of the box

Cursor is a powerful AI-powered code editor that dramatically speeds up development by providing intelligent code suggestions and completions. However, AI assistants optimize for functionality and developer productivity, which can sometimes mean security best practices take a back seat.

What Cursor leaves to you

When Cursor helps you write code quickly, it's easy to accept suggestions that work but may have security implications. API keys might end up in source files, input validation might be skipped, and security configurations might be deferred for 'later' and forgotten.

The security gaps that actually appear in Cursor apps

  1. **Prompt Injection in MCP Servers** — Malicious content in MCP tool responses can execute arbitrary commands.

2. **Workspace Trust Exploitation** — Malicious .cursor/rules files execute when opening untrusted projects.

3. **Code Suggestion Security Flaws** — AI suggests vulnerable patterns: SQL injection, hardcoded secrets, weak auth.

Platform security is strong where Cursor controls the stack. The gaps above all sit in the application layer — where Cursor's guarantees end and yours begin.

Verdict

Cursor can be run securely. Treat "is Cursor secure" as a deployment-time question, not a platform question: run a security scan, verify Row Level Security (RLS) policies are configured, and close the specific gaps above. Platforms with better defaults (e.g. enforced Row Level Security) would reduce the work — but none of them make scanning unnecessary.

Security Research & Statistics

10.3%

of Lovable applications (170 out of 1,645) had exposed user data in the CVE-2025-48757 incident

Source: CVE-2025-48757 security advisory

4.45 million USD

average cost of a data breach in 2023

Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023

500,000+

developers using vibe coding platforms like Lovable, Bolt, and Replit

Source: Combined platform statistics 2024-2025

Expert Perspectives

There's a new kind of coding I call 'vibe coding', where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists.

Andrej KarpathyFormer Tesla AI Director, OpenAI Co-founder

It's not really coding - I just see stuff, say stuff, run stuff, and copy paste stuff, and it mostly works.

Andrej KarpathyFormer Tesla AI Director, OpenAI Co-founder

Check Your Cursor App's Security

VAS scans for all the security issues mentioned above. Get a comprehensive security report in minutes.

Get Starter Scan

More Questions About This Topic

Is Cursor secure enough for production?

Yes — once verified. The platform layer handles infrastructure reliably; the application layer (access controls, secrets, auth) is where production readiness is won or lost. Verification is a scan + manual review of Row Level Security (RLS) policies, not a vibe check.

What percentage of Cursor apps have security issues before review?

Based on the breaches we track and community reporting, the majority of Cursor apps deployed without a pre-launch scan have at least one critical or high-severity finding. The #1 recurring finding is "Prompt Injection in MCP Servers". This is not unique to Cursor — it's the base rate for AI-assisted development — but it means the default state of a shipped Cursor app is "unverified."

Does Cursor itself have security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001)?

Platform certifications from Cursor apply to the Cursor infrastructure — not to your app built with Cursor. Even if Cursor is SOC 2-compliant, your app can still leak data through misconfigured Row Level Security (RLS) policies, exposed secrets, or missing access checks. Compliance for your app is a separate effort; the platform's certifications are necessary but never sufficient.