Cursor
Security FAQ

What are Cursor security best practices?

Get instant answers about your app's security.

Short Answer

Cursor security best practices are dictated by Cursor's actual risk profile, not a generic checklist. The top three: review mcp server sources; enable workspace trust in settings; review all ai suggestions critically.

Detailed Answer

The best practices specific to Cursor (not generic OWASP)

Every "security best practices" list tells you to use HTTPS and rotate keys. Those are table stakes. The list below is what actually matters for Cursor apps, based on the risks that appear in real Cursor deployments.

1. Review MCP server sources

*Why:* Malicious content in MCP tool responses can execute arbitrary commands. *Do this:* Review MCP server sources. Avoid untrusted MCP integrations. Watch for suspicious tool calls.

2. Enable Workspace Trust in settings

*Why:* Malicious .cursor/rules files execute when opening untrusted projects. *Do this:* Enable Workspace Trust in settings. Review .cursor/ files before opening projects.

3. Review all AI suggestions critically

*Why:* AI suggests vulnerable patterns: SQL injection, hardcoded secrets, weak auth. *Do this:* Review all AI suggestions critically. Run security scans on generated code.

4. Enable Privacy Mode

*Why:* Code sent to AI servers may expose proprietary logic or secrets. *Do this:* Enable Privacy Mode. Use .cursorignore for sensitive files.

5. Verify all package suggestions exist

*Why:* AI suggests non-existent packages that attackers could register. *Do this:* Verify all package suggestions exist. Check package reputation before installing.

Cursor-specific: audit every table for RLS before every deploy

The failure mode in Cursor + Supabase apps is always the same: a table gets added during a feature push, RLS never gets turned on, the full table becomes queryable via the anon key. Bake a pre-deploy check: `select tablename from pg_tables where schemaname = 'public' and not rowsecurity` — the result must be empty.

Verification

Even perfect best practices don't prove themselves — the only way to confirm the list above is implemented is to scan a deployed Cursor app. VAS probes each of secret detection, code security, database security, security headers by actually attempting the attack, not just reading headers or docs.

Security Research & Statistics

10.3%

of Lovable applications (170 out of 1,645) had exposed user data in the CVE-2025-48757 incident

Source: CVE-2025-48757 security advisory

4.45 million USD

average cost of a data breach in 2023

Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023

500,000+

developers using vibe coding platforms like Lovable, Bolt, and Replit

Source: Combined platform statistics 2024-2025

Expert Perspectives

There's a new kind of coding I call 'vibe coding', where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists.

Andrej KarpathyFormer Tesla AI Director, OpenAI Co-founder

It's not really coding - I just see stuff, say stuff, run stuff, and copy paste stuff, and it mostly works.

Andrej KarpathyFormer Tesla AI Director, OpenAI Co-founder

Check Your Cursor App's Security

VAS scans for all the security issues mentioned above. Get a comprehensive security report in minutes.

Get Starter Scan

More Questions About This Topic

What's the single most important Cursor security step?

Review MCP server sources. Avoid untrusted MCP integrations. Watch for suspicious tool calls. This closes prompt injection in mcp servers, which is the #1 critical-impact finding in Cursor apps. Everything else is secondary — if this one gap exists, the rest doesn't matter.

Should I follow Cursor's docs or a third-party best-practices list?

Both, for different things. Cursor's docs tell you *how* to configure their specific features — that's authoritative. Third-party best practices (including this one) tell you *which* failure modes show up in real Cursor deployments — that's where Cursor's docs under-deliver, because Cursor doesn't advertise what its own users misconfigure. Use docs for syntax, external guidance for priority.

How often should I re-audit Cursor app security?

Before every production release, without exception. Cursor's AI-assisted workflow means database schemas, API endpoints, and auth logic can change in a single chat session — any of which can introduce an issue from the list above. Weekly automated scans for live Cursor apps are a reasonable baseline; post-feature scans are non-negotiable.