Firebase vs MongoDB Security
Firebase and MongoDB represent different approaches to NoSQL databases with distinct security models. Firebase uses Security Rules evaluated per-request, while MongoDB relies on role-based access control and application-level security. Understanding these differences is crucial for building secure applications, especially given MongoDB's history of exposed databases.
Get Starter ScanSecurity Comparison
The Verdict
Firebase provides stronger built-in security controls with Security Rules that enforce access at the query level. MongoDB's flexibility requires more application-level security implementation, and its history of exposed databases (due to default configurations) makes it higher risk for inexperienced developers. For vibe-coded apps, Firebase's declarative rules are easier to reason about.
For new projects, especially those built with AI tools, Firebase's Security Rules provide guardrails that catch common mistakes. If using MongoDB, use Atlas (not self-hosted), enable authentication immediately, implement application-level access control rigorously, and consider adding an ORM like Mongoose for schema validation.
Industry Security Context
When comparing Firebase vs MongoDB, consider these broader security trends.
of Lovable applications (170 out of 1,645) had exposed user data in the CVE-2025-48757 incident
Source: CVE-2025-48757 security advisory
of data breaches involve databases with misconfigured access controls
Source: Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report
average cost of a data breach in 2023
Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023
“Vibe coding your way to a production codebase is clearly risky. Most of the work we do as software engineers involves evolving existing systems, where the quality and understandability of the underlying code is crucial.”
Using Firebase or MongoDB?
Regardless of which platform you choose, VAS scans for security issues specific to your stack.
Start Security ScanFrequently Asked Questions
Why has MongoDB had more publicized breaches than Firebase?
MongoDB's historical default configuration allowed unauthenticated access, and many developers deployed without changing this. The 2017-2020 ransomware attacks affected 47,000+ exposed MongoDB instances. Firebase also has insecure defaults (test mode), but its client-side SDK model means the database isn't directly exposed to the internet the same way.
Is NoSQL injection a concern for both databases?
NoSQL injection is a bigger concern for MongoDB. Attackers can inject query operators like {$gt: ''} to bypass authentication or extract data. Firebase's structured query API and Security Rules make this type of injection much harder. Always validate input types when using MongoDB, especially in query parameters.
Which is easier to secure for AI-generated apps?
Firebase is generally easier to secure because Security Rules provide a declarative layer that can catch mistakes even in AI-generated code. MongoDB requires application-level security that AI tools often skip or implement incorrectly. However, you still need to write proper Firebase rules - test mode is not secure.
How do I migrate security between these databases?
Security models are completely different and don't translate directly. Firebase Rules are declarative and request-scoped; MongoDB security is role-based and application-enforced. Document your security requirements in plain language first, then implement appropriately for each platform. VAS can verify your implementation on either.